Florida’s governor recently signed a bill repealing a 2023 law that would have required high schools to start no earlier than 8:30 AM and middle schools no earlier than 8:00 AM by 2026. Instead, districts must now justify to the State Board of Education why they can’t meet those times—a move that reignites the national debate over adolescent sleep and school schedules.
Why Later Start Times Were Proposed
Advocates, including the group Start School Later, argue that early start times deprive teens of critical sleep, leading to:
- Poor academic performance
- Emotional dysregulation
- Higher obesity rates
- Increased car accidents (drowsy driving peaks in teens)
Citing research on adolescent biology—teens’ natural sleep cycles shift later—proponents called early starts a “public health crisis” and even “inhumane.” California remains the only state with a mandated later start law (though rural districts can opt out).
Why Florida Changed Course
After two years of district-level studies, practical hurdles outweighed the benefits:
Transportation Chaos
Most districts use the same buses for multiple routes, traditionally prioritizing older students first.
Reversing routes to accommodate later high school starts would force younger kids (who need more sleep) onto pre-dawn schedules.
Costs for additional buses/drivers proved prohibitive.
After-School Domino Effect
- Later dismissals clash with jobs, sports, childcare duties, and extracurriculars.
- Teens often care for siblings after school; working parents rely on this.
Local Control Pushback
Districts argued they should weigh trade-offs themselves, not follow a one-size-fits-all state mandate.
Superintendents juggle competing demands from parents, teachers, employers, and transportation staff.
The Bigger Picture
Florida’s reversal mirrors challenges seen nationwide:
Only California enforces late starts statewide (with rural exceptions).
Other states (like New Jersey and Maryland) have pending bills—now likely to face tougher scrutiny post-Florida.
Critics say advocates oversimplify the issue by focusing only on sleep science, ignoring logistical realities.
What’s Next?
With Florida’s U-turn, legislators in other states may:
- Pause bills to study unintended consequences.
- Compromise with incentives rather than mandates.
- Let districts decide—as Florida now does.
“This isn’t just about biology,” one Florida administrator noted. “It’s about buses, babysitting, and budgets.”
Related topic:
