The role of religion in mental health has long been debated, with some studies suggesting faith communities offer emotional support and healthier lifestyles, while others question their measurable impact. A new longitudinal study by University of Bologna researcher Gabriele Prati (2025) challenges the notion that religious attendance inherently boosts psychological well-being—raising questions about religion’s “special” influence on mental health.
The Social and Health Benefits of Religion: A Closer Look
Religious involvement is often linked to social bonding, reduced substance use, and structured routines. Previous research highlights that congregants may benefit from built-in support networks, which can provide practical aid and emotional comfort during hardships. Prati’s study acknowledges these correlations but probes whether religious attendance directly improves mental health—or if healthier individuals simply participate more.
To test this, Prati analyzed 18 years of data from the Understanding Society—British Household Panel Survey (BHPS), tracking religious service attendance and mental health outcomes in UK adults. Participants (averaging 44 years old at baseline) were predominantly non-attendees: 50–66% never visited a house of worship, while just 11–16% attended regularly. Most affiliated with Christianity (Anglican: 36%; Catholic: 9%), though 38% reported no religious ties.
Surprising Findings: No Mental Health Boost
Using advanced statistical models, Prati found no significant long-term mental health benefits tied to religious attendance—contrary to earlier studies. “The findings cast doubt on religion’s specialness in mental health,” she wrote, noting that prior research may have overlooked confounding factors or overrelied on cross-sectional data.
Four Key Explanations
Quality Over Quantity: Mere attendance doesn’t guarantee positive social interactions.
Methodological Gaps: Prati’s longitudinal approach controlled for variables that shorter studies might miss.
Cultural Context: The UK’s secular society may dilute benefits observed in more devout cultures.
Sporadic Measurements: Infrequent mental health assessments could miss fleeting post-service mood lifts.
Limitations and Unanswered Questions
The study focused on broad mental health metrics, not deeper spiritual or moral impacts. It also excluded non-Christian groups and didn’t account for potential downsides, such as guilt over unmet religious standards or conflicts arising from doctrinal disagreements.
Practical Takeaways
For individuals seeking mental well-being:
Social bonds matter more than location: Positive interactions—whether in congregations or secular groups—are key.
Health behaviors are independent: Avoiding smoking or excessive drinking need not hinge on religious adherence.
Context shapes outcomes: In less secular societies, religious engagement might yield different results.
Prati’s work underscores the complexity of mental health, where no single factor—including religion—acts as a universal remedy. Future research could explore diverse faiths, cultural settings, and granular psychological measures to clarify these dynamics.
Bottom Line: While religion offers community and structure, its mental health benefits may depend less on weekly attendance than on how individuals engage with their beliefs and others.
Related topic:
