Being sectioned, or detained under mental health law, is a serious and often misunderstood process. It involves a legal framework designed to protect individuals who may be a danger to themselves or others due to severe mental health conditions. The decision to section someone is not taken lightly, and it follows strict guidelines to ensure that the individual’s rights are respected while also addressing their immediate safety needs. Understanding what leads to sectioning requires an exploration of mental health laws, the criteria for detention, and the psychological factors that influence such decisions.
The Legal Framework Behind Sectioning
What Does It Mean to Be Sectioned?
In many countries, including the UK, being “sectioned” refers to being detained under specific sections of mental health legislation. For instance, in England and Wales, the Mental Health Act 1983 (amended in 2007) outlines the circumstances under which a person can be compulsorily admitted to a psychiatric hospital. The term comes from the different sections of the law that authorize detention, such as Section 2 for assessment and Section 3 for treatment.
Who Can Decide to Section Someone?
The decision to section an individual is not made by just one person. It typically involves multiple professionals, including psychiatrists, approved mental health professionals (AMHPs), and sometimes the police if there is an immediate risk. A thorough assessment must confirm that the person meets the legal criteria for detention, ensuring that their rights are not violated unnecessarily.
The Psychological and Behavioral Criteria for Sectioning
Severe Mental Health Conditions
Not everyone with a mental health disorder can be sectioned. The law applies to individuals with severe conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or severe depression with psychotic features. These illnesses must be of a nature or degree that warrants detention for assessment or treatment.
Risk to Self or Others
One of the primary reasons for sectioning is the presence of significant risk. This could include suicidal ideation with a clear plan, self-harm behaviors, or violent tendencies toward others. Mental health professionals assess whether the person can make rational decisions about their care—if their judgment is impaired due to their condition, sectioning may be considered.
Lack of Insight or Refusal of Treatment
Some individuals with severe mental health disorders may not recognize that they are unwell—a phenomenon known as “lack of insight.” If they refuse voluntary treatment despite being in clear distress or danger, compulsory detention might be the only option to ensure they receive the help they need.
The Process of Being Sectioned
Initial Assessment and Emergency Detention
In urgent cases, a person can be temporarily detained under emergency sections (such as Section 4 or Section 136 in the UK). This often happens when someone is found in a public place displaying highly disturbed behavior. Police or mental health professionals can hold them for a short period until a full assessment is completed.
The Role of Mental Health Professionals
A formal assessment usually involves at least two doctors (one of whom must be a psychiatrist) and an AMHP. They evaluate the person’s mental state, risk factors, and whether less restrictive alternatives (like community treatment) are possible. If they agree that detention is necessary, the sectioning process begins.
Rights and Appeals
Being sectioned does not mean losing all rights. Individuals can appeal their detention through mental health tribunals, and safeguards are in place to prevent unnecessary or prolonged confinement. Regular reviews ensure that detention remains justified.
Ethical and Psychological Considerations
Balancing Autonomy and Safety
One of the biggest ethical dilemmas in mental health care is balancing a person’s right to autonomy with the need to protect them from harm. While sectioning can save lives, it also involves restricting freedom, which can be traumatic. Mental health professionals must weigh these factors carefully.
The Impact of Compulsory Detention
Being sectioned can have lasting psychological effects. Some individuals feel relieved to receive help, while others experience distress, anger, or a sense of betrayal. The way professionals handle the process—with empathy and transparency—can significantly influence the person’s recovery.
Alternatives to Sectioning
Community Treatment Orders (CTOs)
In some cases, less restrictive measures like CTOs allow individuals to receive treatment while living at home. They must comply with certain conditions, but they avoid full hospitalization unless necessary.
Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Teams
These teams provide intensive support to people in mental health crises, often preventing the need for detention by offering rapid intervention in their own environment.
Conclusion
Sectioning is a complex and carefully regulated process meant to protect individuals in severe mental health crises. It involves legal, ethical, and psychological considerations to ensure that detention is used only when absolutely necessary. Understanding how and why people are sectioned helps demystify the process and highlights the importance of compassionate mental health care. While compulsory detention is sometimes unavoidable, the ultimate goal is to provide support that respects dignity and promotes recovery.
By exploring the legal framework, psychological criteria, and ethical challenges, we gain a clearer picture of what it truly means to be sectioned—and why it remains a critical, though sometimes controversial, aspect of mental health care.
Related topic:
